November 24, 2008

Georgia Ban on Texting While Driving a Reality Soon?

textingoncellphone.jpg

As many of you know who read my blog regularly, one of my pet peeves is folks who text while driving a motor vehicle out on the streets of Atlanta, or really anywhere in Georgia. I wrote about this recently when the State of California banned texting while driving, and I assume California has many more licensed drivers than Georgia, given the relative sizes and populations of the two states. Studies have proven that texting while driving makes you just about as compromised of a driver as a driver who is intoxicated.

So you can imagine my excitement when I see today an article announcing that certain Georgia legislators are planning to sponsor a bill in the 2009 Georgia General Assembly session to make texting while driving illegal for Georgia teenagers. A reasonable person might now ask why should this law apply only to teenagers? Isn't it just as dangerous for adults to text while driving? And I would say, yes, it is, and yes, the law should apply to all drivers in Georgia; however, like many things, this is an issue we must take baby steps at a time with, and the logical place to begin is with Georgia teenage drivers, who text and receive texts hundreds of times a day and who have little driving experience at all, much less experience driving while texting.

So it is a start, and that's where things must begin. I congratulate the Georgia lawmakers who have taken this on and hope the other Georgia legislators see fit to pass this important bill.

November 20, 2008

$650,000.00 Verdict in DeKalb County, Georgia Against Likely Suspect, GDOT

gdot_logo.png


I am tickled to report a verdict this week in DeKalb County, Georgia against the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) in the amount of $650,000.00 for the DOT's negligence is causing a collision that resulted in a fractured hip and hip replacement of the plaintiff. Couldn't happen to a more deserving defendant. My readers have known for years now what utterly ridiculous stances the GDOT takes in its litigation, at Georgia taxpayer expense. And this is after they have injured a Georgia citizen!

The plaintiff in the DeKalb County case was the driver of a van that was struck by a DOT truck as the truck crossed the gore on I-20, resulting in a hip replacement. Defendant DOT contended that the truck was stopped in the gore and that the plaintiff drove into the back of it. It is illegal for a car or truck to cross through the gore. Can you believe the silly position the GDOT took in this case, that the plaintiff drove into the back of the DOT truck? The DeKalb County jury saw through this smokescreen and insured justice prevailed for this poor injured Georgia citizen. This case probably could have been settled for well less than the verdict prior to trial...but the GDOT and its insurance carrier, the Department of Administrative Services (DOAS), continue to show its extreme hardheadedness in refusing to admit fault where the DOT is at fault and refusing to try to mitigate the damages and the impact to the pockets of Georgia citizens. What is wrong with the Georgia Department of Transportation?

Once more the GDOT thumbed its nose at the Georgia Rules of the Road, that we all have to follow, and then when the DOT got caught, cried "I didn't do anything wrong." Leave it to a good ole DeKalb County jury to set the DOT straight. The jury system is a wonderful thing indeed and the best thing we have to level the playing field against the likes of the Georgia DOT.

November 3, 2008

United States Supreme Court to Hear Federal Preemption Case Today


fda_art_160_20071108145611.jpg

It might not be readily apparent how a case being argued in the United States Supreme Court regarding the Federal Preemption Doctrine has a tremendous effect on the rights of Georgia citizens, but it does. The United State Supreme Court is hearing arguments today in Levine v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and the high Court's decision has far-reaching implication, even to the point of potentially limiting every Georgian's right to recover against a drug manufacturer for negligent manufacture and distribution of all kinds of drugs we Georgians have come to believe are safe and therapeutic.

Not so fast I say. The first realization every Georgia citizen must come to is that simply because a drug has been approved by the Federal Drug Administration (the FDA) does NOT mean it's safe nor does it mean it has been fully and accurately tested. One of the problems is that the FDA is way too close to drug manufacturers, which has resulted in lack of complete arms length transactions. For example, from 1992-2002, the drug companies paid $825 million dollars to the FDA In the Wyeth case, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a drug manufacturer who made a drug called phenergan, which is used to combat nausea. On its label is a small warning that says if the drug was improperly injected it could lead to the onset of gangrene and the necessary amputation of a limb. Now you probably know where this is headed, right? Diana Levine, a professional guitarist, had the drug injected in her IV in her arm, which caused gangrene, which ultimately led to the amputation of her arm. Ms. Levine sued drugmaker Wyeth, claiming that the company had given insufficient warning of the possible severe effects of its product. A Vermont jury awarded her $6.7 million in compensatory and punitive damages.


Ms. Levine says the FDA is protecting the drug companies from lawsuits, rather than protecting consumers from dangerous drugs. "I had no idea what the risks were," she says of her ordeal with the Wyeth-produced antinausea drug.

Lawyers for Wyeth say Levine's lawsuit is preempted by federal law and federal regulations. They say the antinausea drug, Phenergan, is approved by the FDA and that the agency authorized the content of the company's warning about the possible negative effects of the drug. A Vermont jury agreed with Ms. Levine and awarded her $6.8 million for her loss. Now the preemption argument comes into play. Wyeth, Inc. says because the FDA approved the label, it doesn't matter what the Vermont jury thought of its conduct. The FDA is Wyeth, Inc's "get out of jail free" card. And herein lies the problem. If Wyeth, Inc. wins, no Georgia citizen would ever be able to bring a lawsuit against a drug manufacturer for negligent conduct because the corporation would be able to hide behind an FDA approval. Justice denied. For example, in February, the Supreme Court ruled in a major preemption case that individuals injured by a defective medical device could not sue the manufacturer if the device received pre-market approval by the FDA. This is not headed in the right direction for the consumer, which should show you how important the Presidential election tomorrow is. If there continues to be appointments made to the United States Supreme Court of justices who show no hesitancy to restrict or even take away the rights of everyday Americans to seek justice in our courts, we can forget that great notion of "justice for all." It will simply have no meaning in our courts, whether in Washington, D.C., Vermont or our beloved Georgia.

If interested, you can read the briefs filed in the United States Supreme Court in this case at http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Wyeth_v._Levine This is such a crucial case in American jurisprudence that it is being closely watched by thousands.

So I will watch Levine v. Wyeth, Inc. closely (we won't have the Supreme Court opinion issued for months) and will pray for the best, that the rights afforded us by the Constitution and the laws of the States will continue to allow Georgians to be able to obtain justice when they have, unfortunately, been wronged.