February 20, 2009

Georgians Deserve Better than What Governor Perdue Offers with FDA Immunity

money_and_pharmacy.jpg


I have written about the attempt going on RIGHT NOW at the Georgia Capitol by Governor Perdue and Senator Bill Cowsert and others who take up Governor Perdue's mantra to eliminate Georgian's rights to sue a Georgia pharmaceutical company if its drug harms a Georgian. Senate Bill 101, heard yesterday in the Economic Development Committee (NOT the Judiciary Committee, where it actually belongs), would strip Georgians of ALL of our rights to hold a Georgia drug manufacturer liable for damages its drug causes a Georgian. Ironically, this bill would hurt ONLY Georgians; those folks who took the drug in any other state, Alabama, for example, WOULD be able to hold the Georgia company responsible for the harm it causes, as it should be. Can you imagine any worse affrong to the rights of Georgia citizens than this? This should show you how little the Governor of Georgia and his followers in the Georgia General Assembly think of the welfare of Georgia consumers. Yesterday in the Committee hearing, the Chairperson did not allow the Committee to vote on the bill.


ACT NOW! Folks, now is the time for everyone living in the State of Georgia to call your State Senator and ask them to vote NO on Senate Bill 101. Also, now is the time to call the Governor's office and let Governor Perdue know you don't appreciate his underhanded attempts to eliminate your constitutional rights.

Enough is enough.

Below is a wonderful letter by fellow trial lawyer Josh Branch published yesterday in the Athens, Georgia Banner-Herald. Josh is absolutely 100% correct.

Josh Branch: Limiting liability is wrong move
Athens Banner-Herald | Story updated at 8:11 pm on 2/18/2009


Senate Bill 101, backed by Gov. Sonny Perdue and now making its way through the state Senate, would free Georgia-based pharmaceutical corporations that make dangerous drugs or medical devices from accountability for any harm they cause, so long as their drug or medical device has received federal Food and Drug Administration approval. The bill grants complete immunity from liability to the corporation while stripping the constitutional rights of the citizens of this state.

Vioxx was an FDA-approved drug that seriously harmed or killed at least 139,000 people. If a drug were made here that killed Georgians as Vioxx did, our residents would have absolutely no recourse. A person in Phenix City, Ala., just across the state line, could pursue justice in the courts; a person in Columbus, Ga., just inside the state line, could not. Why take away the rights of citizens in your own state?

Perdue should not hand the lives of our citizens over to a federal bureaucracy and at the same time strip them of any right they have to seek a civil remedy if something goes horribly wrong. Georgians deserve much better than that.

While it's clear where the governor's priorities lay, let's hope elected members of the legislature think otherwise.

Josh Branch


February 9, 2009

New Safety Requirements in Effect for Commercial Pools

A new law has gone into effect for commercial pools that requires these pools all to have drains with anti-entrapment devices. Without these devices, a swimmer, usually a small child, can become entrapped by the sheer force of the drain suction. Some children have even been eviscerated by the strong suction in pool drains. This new law is designed to insure no other entrapments occur. Pools must be compliant with the new law as of December 18, 2008, so now all commercial pools should have these non-entrapment devices installed on their drains. Below is more information from the Consumer Product Safety Commission. If you regularly use a commercial pool, e.g., a country club pool, a county park pool or homeowner's association pool, now is the time, before summer, to verify with the Board of Directors that your pool has the proper drain and is compliance with this new law. We want to make sure all Georgia swimmers are safe this summer!

Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act
June 18, 2008 Staff Interpretation of Section 1404:
“Federal Swimming Pool and Spa Drain Cover Standard”*
On December 19, 2007, the President signed into law the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool
and Spa Safety Act, named after the daughter of Nancy Baker and the granddaughter of
former Secretary of State James Baker. Graeme Baker died in a tragic incident in June
2002 after the suction from a spa drain entrapped her under the water. This Act was first
introduced by Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (FL) and was supported by the Baker
family and Safe Kids Worldwide.
There is an annual average of 283 drowning deaths (2003-2005) and 2,700 emergency
room-treated submersion injuries (2005-2007) involving children younger than 5 in pools
and spas. In addition, from 1997-2007, there were 74 reported incidents associated with
suction entrapment, including 9 deaths and 63 injuries. The new law is aimed at reducing
these deaths and injuries by making pools safer, securing the environment around them,
and educating consumers and industry on pool safety.
The Act specifies that on or after December 19, 2008, swimming pool and spa drain
covers available for purchase in the United States must meet specific performance
requirements. Additionally, public swimming pools, wading pools, spas and hot tubs
must meet requirements for installation of compliant drain covers. New drain covers
which meet the current standard are now beginning to make their way into the
marketplace. Additionally, in certain instances, public pools and spas must have
additional devices or systems designed to prevent suction entrapment.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) staff has prepared this guidance
document that spells out the technical requirements of Section 1404 of the Act, along
with CPSC staff’s answers to certain enforcement and legal issues. This document takes
into account comments provided to CPSC during an open comment period in March
2008. Comments were provided by a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, state
government officials, pool industry representatives, safety equipment manufacturers and
representatives, consumer safety organizations, and others.
CPSC staff urges all public pool and spa owners/operators, state and local health and
safety officials, and those in the pool and spa industry to carefully review this document
as they work toward complying with Section 1404 of the Act prior to December 19,
2008.
Contact CPSC at info@cpsc.gov or 301.504.7908 if you need further assistance.
* This document, which was prepared by CPSC staff, has not been reviewed or
approved by and may not necessarily represent the views of the Commission.
ENGINEERING/MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS
Note: italicized language is taken directly from the Pool & Spa Safety Act.
Drain Covers: …each public pool and spa in the United States shall be equipped with
anti-entrapment devices or systems that comply with the ASME/ANSI A112.19.8
performance standard, or any successor standard…
Staff interpretation: All public pools and spas must have ASME/ANSI
A112.19.81 compliant Drain Covers on or after December 19, 2008. The basic
requirements of the ASME/ANSI standard are:
• Cover material must be tested for structural integrity
• Cover must be tested for body entrapment and hair entrapment/entanglement
• Cover must display a flow value in gallons per minute (gpm) that indicates the
maximum flow rate for which the cover has been approved
Main Drain: The term “main drain” means a submerged suction outlet typically located
at the bottom of a pool or spa to conduct water to a recirculating pump.
Single Main Drain: …each public pool and spa in the United States with a single main
drain other than an unblockable drain…
Staff interpretation: A main drain is a term usually referring to a plumbing fitting
installed on the suction side of the pump in pools, spas and hot tubs (a suction
outlet). Sometimes referred to as the drain, it is normally located in the deepest
part of the pool, spa or hot tub. It does not literally drain the pool, spa or hot tub
as a sink drain would, but rather connects to the pump to allow water to be drawn
from the pool, spa or hot tub for circulation and filtration.
Staff interpretation: The term “single main drain” means a submerged suction
outlet, with or without a skimmer, connected to a dedicated pool pump. A pool
may have more than one single main drain if it has multiple suction outlets that
are each connected to a dedicated pump. A group of suction outlets connected
together is considered a single main drain if the centers of the outlets are located
within three feet of one another.
Staff interpretation: Pools and spas with multiple main drains are not subject to
the requirements of Section 1404(c)(1)(A)(ii).
Staff interpretation: Multiple main drains consist of, at minimum, two fully
submerged suction outlets per pump, with drain cover centers at least 3 feet apart.
While no maximum separation is noted, the connections between the outlets and
the pump are important for proper operation and should be certified by a design
professional and inspected by a licensed inspector to ensure hydraulic balance
between outlets and the main suction line to the pump.
1 The current approved version of this standard is A112.19.8-2007. There is an Addendum moving forward
through the ASME/ANSI ballot process to correct errors in the test method for UV light exposure. The
prior version of this standard is 1987 (reaffirmed in 1996) and addresses only hair entrapment.


February 7, 2009

Justice Leah Sears, Chief Justice of the Georgia Supreme Court, an Inspiration to All Georgians

On February 4, 2009 Justice Leah Sears, the Chief Justice of the Georgia Supreme Court, gave her last State of the Judiciary address to the Georgia General Assembly. It is her last such address because she has announced she will be retiring from the bench in June of this year. Georgia lawyers will miss her, because of her absolute committment to a strong, independent Judiciary and to the Rule of Law. She is a true role model for all Georgians, especially young women like my daughter, Alex, who is now 11 years old, and who are looking for the way to make their mark on Georgia and future generations. Below I have reprinted Justice Sears' entire State of the Judiciary Address.

Lieutenant Governor Cagle, Speaker Richardson, Speaker Pro Tem Burkhalter, President Pro Tem Williams and other members of the General Assembly. Ladies and Gentlemen. I am overwhelmed by your warm welcome.

Today I stand before this distinguished body for the last time as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia. I am both honored and humbled. I have so many of you to thank for your years of support and encouragement. And I am forever indebted to my colleagues on the Supreme Court—my friends—Presiding Justice Carol Hunstein, former Chief Justice Robert Benham, and Justices George Carley, Hugh Thompson, Harris Hines and Harold Melton. I am also grateful to my friends on the Georgia Court of Appeals, now being ably led by Chief Judge Yvette Miller, as well as all of my other colleagues in the judicial branch.

__________________________

The judicial system's budget is less than one percent of the overall state budget, but we play a huge role in protecting the safety and security of Georgia citizens. Unfortunately, like others in state government, we have had to slash our budget to the bone. We have reduced personnel and cut our expenditures. Before this economic downturn, this state's appellate courts were well on our way toward unveiling an electronic filing system to make all our courts more accessible to people throughout the state. Such a system is a minimum requirement in this 21st century. Unfortunately, we have had to put that on indefinite hold.

We are deeply concerned, as you are, about the present financial situation and its effect on Georgians. We are particularly troubled about its impact on the delivery of justice to our citizens. Even in good economic times, the administration of justice is difficult to fulfill given the sheer volume and complexity of problems Georgians bring to their courthouses. Because of the effects of the nation's bad economy, people will need access to justice now more than ever. We already see this happening. The number of mortgage foreclosure cases in Georgia is at an all time high. Debt

collection has increased dramatically. We may also begin to see an increase in other types of problems that typically escalate during tough economic times, such as crime, child abuse, domestic violence and substance abuse.

We are frequently reminded that government cannot do everything. And that is true. Government cannot do everything, and in times like these, government cannot afford to do everything. But there are some things that only government can do, and these things it must do well. Administering justice under the law is a function that only government can fulfill. The determination of guilt and innocence, property rights and parental rights, legal privileges and power are judgments only government can make. Administering justice is one of the reasons governments exist. If we neglect this fundamental obligation to the people, we break trust with them, and ultimately, lose their confidence. And for government, public trust and confidence is everything.

No doubt you have heard what other states' judicial systems are now doing to cope with our nation's troubled economy. Some states have closed their courthouses a few days a month. New Hampshire has cut back on the number of jury trials it holds. Several states, including Utah, are leaving judgeships vacant following retirements, including a few who have vacancies on their Supreme Courts. These are drastic steps. They will deny justice to many. In Georgia, we cannot afford to go down this path.

Nevertheless, I am confident that even in the face of economic turbulence, the future of our judiciary is as bright and solid and undaunted as is the bedrock optimism of our people. After all, we are Americans. And we are Georgians. That means that, working with you and the Governor, we will be bold. We will learn to do more with less. And for the safety and security of our state, we will endure, and we will prevail.

That is in large part because Georgia is fortunate. This state's judges are among the best in the nation. I am honored to have stood with them all these years. Like me, many have devoted their careers to guaranteeing that all citizens of our state receive fair and impartial justice. I will miss being a part of “the brotherhood.” And I will miss all of you.

__________________________

It's never easy to say good-bye. I have been truly blessed. When I embarked on my judicial career 26 years ago, I never imagined that it would turn out as it has. Indeed, the world has changed much since I first became a judge. I was a mere 27 years old when Mayor Andrew Young appointed me to Atlanta's traffic court. It was 1982—the year USA Today was first published, Diet Coke was born, and the Weather Channel aired for the first time. Voicemail was patented that year, and back then, most of us lived without cell phones, e-mail or laptops. Imagine that!

To some extent, my career as a judge has been a metaphor of how much our great state has changed. In 1988, when I ran to become a Fulton County Superior Court judge, there were only four African-American superior court judges in the whole state, and only six women. I can still remember my first day on the bench. I was trying a simple zoning case when I noticed that the room was packed. Standing room only. Deputies, court reporters, administrative assistants and other spectators were lining the walls and peering through the windows. They were there to watch me try my first case, as if I were an alien who had landed in Fulton County.

And I'll never forget 1992 around Valentine's Day when Governor Zell Miller called and said to me, “Judge, I want to let you know I am going to appoint you to the Supreme Court of Georgia.” I was flabbergasted. I was only 36 years old—the youngest person ever to be appointed to the Supreme Court. I was a woman—no woman had ever served on that court. And I was an African-American—the second, just behind my friend and colleague Justice Benham. Somehow I managed to regain my composure to thank Governor Miller. And I pledged to him that I would never let him down. I have always tried to live up to that promise.

__________________________

Permit me to tell you a few of the things I have learned in the 26 years I have been a judge. I have learned that people are far more complex than the labels we sometimes affix to them. As judges, we would not be doing our jobs if we paid attention to labels because we have but one purpose: to know and uphold the laws of the State of Georgia and the United States, regardless of where the chips may fall. That means that in our work we can espouse no ideology, no partisan political views, and we must ignore the false assumptions people sometimes make.

I have learned that the people of Georgia are fortunate to have attorneys of the highest quality. I am always amazed at the ability of Georgia's lawyers to present vigorous, well-reasoned arguments on both sides of complicated issues and to answer the probing questions of the justices of our Court. I commend the State Bar of Georgia for all it does to maintain the exceptional quality of Georgia lawyers.

I have learned that whether you are a member of the legislative, executive or judicial branches, we are all servants of the people, and we are all in this together. That means we must communicate and cooperate with one another to accomplish the people's business. And we can do that in a way that preserves the integrity of all branches and honors the concept of the separation of powers.

I have learned that sometimes a whisper is better than a roar. I now know that to get your point across, you don't always need to carry a big stick. I've also learned that while you should never shy away from standing up and speaking out for that which you believe is right, you have to pick your battles. On a court like ours, the only way to succeed is with your intellect and your integrity. The best judges listen more than they talk. And they are patient. That often means that when your position doesn't prevail, you have to let it go and move on.

I have learned that the most rewarding part of my career has not been the offices I have held but the people I have met and with whom I've had the privilege of working. Since I've been Chief Justice, I have only been treated with generosity and kindness. The fact is that I have had the exceptional privilege of working with exceptional people who have dedicated years of hard—and at times heartbreaking—work to make Georgia's judicial system the very best in the nation.

__________________________

I am proud that when I step down, I will leave behind—according to a recent national study—the No. 1 most productive Supreme Court in the country. That same study ranked Georgia's high court as one of the five best state Supreme Courts in the nation, based not only on productivity but also on national influence and judicial independence. The Georgia Court of Appeals also has been ranked among the top five appellate courts in the number of opinions issued per judge.

I am also proud that Georgia has a state trial court system that works hard to ensure that all people have access to justice, no matter their status in life. Today, thanks to your support, Georgia is taking the lead with drug courts and mental health courts. This past year, both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges cited the work of Georgia's drug courts as a model for the nation.

In the past, some were skeptical of these so-called “accountability courts,” worried that they coddled criminals. But attitudes have changed because we now know that to prevent crime and save taxpayer dollars, we must break the cycles of drug addiction and mental illness that have contributed to the clogging of our courts and of our jails.

I am also proud of the work of the Georgia Supreme Court Commission on Children, Marriage and Family Law. As you know, I have long been a proponent that “children do better with parents together.” This is not just another do-good campaign unrelated to crime or justice. As a judge, I have seen daily the effects on our courts, not to mention our society, of family dissolution.

There is much sociological data that now suggests that children who grow up in healthy, intact families are less likely to engage in criminal behavior, and are more likely to have productive lives that never lead them to the inside of a courtroom. That's why marriage continues to be the most pro-child institution and antipoverty program we have.

This past year, the Commission co-hosted a national summit on marriage, bringing together experts from around the country to debate and discuss the future of this institution. Governor Perdue joined me in welcoming them to Atlanta.

I hope all of you will continue to join in the efforts to keep marriage alive and strong and valued as an institution, for the sake of our children and our nation. I assure you that whatever I do next, you have not heard the last from me on this issue.

__________________________

Time does not allow me to mention all the people who have served and worked with me through the years. Suffice it to say, the Supreme Court staff is stellar. I know that Presiding Justice Carol Hunstein will receive the same loyal support from this outstanding staff when she takes the reins as chief justice this summer. I wish her every success.

And, of course, I can never thank enough my own family, without whom I would not be here. My children, Addison and Brennan: I am so proud of the young man and woman they have grown up to become. My mother, Onnye Jean SEARS, who along with my late beloved father, always guided me and always believed in me and made me believe in myself. And, of course, my husband, Haskell Ward. Whatever I have been able to achieve as Chief Justice could not have been accomplished without the unfaltering love and support of this man. He has been my strong and steady rock for the last 10 years, and I am always thankful for that. My husband, mother and daughter are here today. Would you please stand.

__________________________

And then, of course, there are my colleagues and dear friends who have served with me on the Supreme Court. We are a collegial bunch. We are people of different perspectives and diverse backgrounds. We are a well-oiled machine that has kept the wheels of justice going in this state for about 15 years now.

At times, I have jokingly compared our little group to family members who get together just once a year at Thanksgiving. There is sometimes a bit of tension, but the respect and the love are always there. Having served so long together, we know each other well—each other's tics and predilections. We can often read each other's facial expressions and anticipate what's coming next, sometimes with dread.

I just want to say how much you all mean to me. There are many precious memories. We've worked hard together. We've argued, sometimes vehemently, only to then break for lunch and enjoy a meal together. We've shared sacrifices and tears, victories and joys. Some of you have held my hand during difficult times, and I've held yours. Each of you is a part of my life's story, and I will forever be grateful. The state of Georgia has benefitted from your service and our cohesiveness.

__________________________

As to the Court's future, my prayer is that whoever the Governor appoints to replace me would build on the progress the Supreme Court of Georgia has already made. My prayer is that the next Justice would be a fair, honest, upright person of the highest integrity, a man or woman who would walk in the same shoes as a Logan Bleckley, Joseph Lamar, Charles Weltner or Norman Fletcher. We have had the greatest of justices in this state, whose courts have not been infected by politics. And that is because our justices were never ideologues. Rather they were just good lawyers, fair and impartial judges, decent men and women.

I suppose my failure as Chief Justice was my inability to get our state's judges a much-needed raise—a raise they have not had in more than a decade. Many of you here worked hard for that goal, and I thank you. I was honored to have so many join in the effort. When our economy improves, for the sake of this state's judicial system, I urge you to renew that effort.

__________________________

I came to the Supreme Court quite young. I determined some time ago to leave before I was too old. It has been a privilege to serve here. But the court, like most institutions, needs constant replenishment with people who are not comfortable with its ways. It is time I moved on.

As to my future, my so-called “retirement” at 53 years old is by no means an end for me. Rather it's a beginning. A rebirth. A launching of a new adventure. I don't know exactly yet what it will be, but like you, I am a public servant at heart. My life has been driven by a desire to do what I can to make things better for all people. And as long as God blesses me with health and well-being, I will continue to serve in some capacity. Just as I pledged to Gov. Miller 17 years ago, I pledge to you today: Whatever I do next, I swear to you, I will not let you down.

Finally, I want to thank the people of Georgia for giving me this extraordinary opportunity. I want to thank the millions I've never met personally who are simply good, solid, hardworking people. Those who voted for me, called me with their words of support, sent me notes and wrote me letters along the way. They were the ones who decided—not once, not twice, but three times—that I was worth keeping around by electing me to office.

I am so proud of this state. I am so very proud to be a Georgian. And I am proud of all of you. God bless and comfort you. God bless Georgia. And God bless America.

February 6, 2009

Georgia Should Not Have a Victim's Pay Law-It Is Unfair to Every Georgian

Governor Perdue is again trying to eliminate the rights of all Georgians to seek legal redress when they have been injured by another person's negligence or carelessness. Please do your part to tell the Governor "No Thanks and No Way."

Enacting ‘Victim Pays’ would be like taking away David’s Slingshot
SB 108 would allow intimidation and fear to rule our court of law

Atlanta, GA—SB 108, a component of Governor Perdue’s so-called “tort reform” package, seeks to enact a ‘Victim Pays’ provision in Georgia law. Current law dictates that each party in a lawsuit pays its own attorney fees unless specific authority is granted by statute or contract allowing for the assessment of those fees against the other party. This provision is known as the ‘American Rule.’ This uniquely American method distinguishes our Civil Justice System from that of much of Europe which still operates under ‘The English Rule.’
The American Civil Justice System was based on the premise that individuals and small businesses, regardless of their financial means, have the right to seek justice for wrongdoing in a court of law that views each party as completely equal. As our Civil Justice System has matured, the American Rule has been championed as a unique equalizer — it does not discourage a person of little-to-no means from pursuing a meritorious claim — whereas ‘Victim Pays’ acts as a deterrent to individuals harmed through no fault of their own by the negligence of others.
“Governor Perdue has used the term ‘Loser Pays’ to label this provision. Yet nothing could be further from the truth” said Fred Orr, President of the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association. “This provision only affects one party in the suit — the plaintiff. If a large corporate defendant loses a claim, they will never have to pay for the victim’s legal fees under this bill, despite how baseless their defenses were.”

“SB 108 as it is written will harm middle class Georgians and small businesses the most,” said Atlanta attorney Darren Penn. “The very rich can afford legal fees and poor plaintiffs, as a practical matter, will not have to pay either. But, your traditional ‘mom and pop’ businesses and regular middle class Georgians could be bankrupted by the steep fees corporate defense attorneys charge.”

Besides creating real fear and intimidation for Georgians who wish to file suit, SB 108 fails to do much else that isn’t already covered by Georgia law. Besides having sanctions against “frivolous” lawsuits in both state and federal courts already in place, our current ‘American Rule’ operates under a contingency fee system — a natural deterrent against claims with little-to-no merit. Under the contingency fee system, the plaintiff’s lawyer carefully reviews a potential case to decide if he or she will take the case. The attorney fronts the entire cost of pursuing the case out of his or her own pocket — receiving no payment from the client. Both the client and the attorney only get paid if they win in court. In the business world, such expenditures are called ‘research and development.” Just as no business is going to spend money researching and developing a product they know to be worthless, no wise attorney would risk their money and their practice by pursuing a “frivolous” claim in court. The personal financial risk would be too high. SB 108 does nothing to improve that situation and is not needed.

“SB 108 is a procedural “gotcha” that will discourage attempts to resolve technical deficiencies in legitimate claims and will encourage gamesmanship and manipulation of the legal system by corporate defendants, rather than facilitating appropriate resolution of disputes between parties,” stated Penn. “Enacting SB 108 is like taking away David’s slingshot. The party with more money, more power and more control will have the ability to scare David into not taking a shot at all, even when David has a righteous cause.”


February 6, 2009

Georgians Deserve Better Than Governor Perdue's Proposed New Tort Reform That Will Make Georgians Less Safe

Warning to all Georgia Citizens: Governor Perdue is trying to do away with your constitutional rights and make you less safe! Please help us stop him by letting him and your Legislators know you do not want them to support this bill. Please contact Governor Perdue now and ask him to withdraw SB 101.

Governor Perdue wants to place the safety of Georgia’s citizens
in the hands of a corrupt and mismanaged federal bureaucracy
SB 101 seeks to rely on the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) amidst grave controversy
while giving large pharmaceutical companies who harm Georgians a “Get out of Jail Free” card

Atlanta, GA-- With the introduction of SB 101, Governor Perdue suggests that a federal bureaucracy embroiled in heavy controversy, the FDA, should have all the power in deciding the safety of pharmaceuticals and medical devices. SB 101 bars any Georgia citizen from bringing a products liability claim against a pharmaceutical corporation so long as it is headquartered or has 200 employees in Georgia and the product in question, either a drug or a medical device, is FDA approved.

“Vioxx was an FDA approved drug that harmed at least 139,000 people. If there were to be a drug or medical device made here in Georgia that injured or killed people like Vioxx did, Georgia residents would have absolutely no recourse. A person in Phoenix City, Alabama could pursue justice; a person in Columbus could not,” said Fred Orr, President of the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association. “The Governor believes SB 101 will bring corporations to Georgia. But I don’t think we want the kind of business this legislation would attract as this bill says, “Move to Georgia! You can harm or kill our citizens and you will not be held accountable!”

The Governor stated early in the session that FDA approval “should mean something” and that it should protect corporations from lawsuits.

“The FDA can’t protect us from peanut butter. How can we possibly rely on the FDA to protect us from dangerous drugs and medical devices?” said Orr. “If a pharmaceutical corporation manufactures a drug or medical device that seriously harms or kills an innocent person, that corporation should not, under any circumstance, be shielded from accountability. The Governor has simply gone too far with this proposal.”

On February 2, 2009 President Obama had harsh words for the FDA and he urged Congress to conduct a complete review of the FDA after the agency failed to protect the public from contaminated peanut butter. At this time the contaminated peanut butter has killed 8 people and sickened over 500 people.

In addition to the agency’s failure to protect the public from peanut butter, as recently as the last month, the FDA has been at the center of three other nationally publicized controversies concerning alleged corruption, mismanagement, and claims of serious financial conflicts of interest. First the federal Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report revealing that the FDA has failed to comply with a congressional mandate set nineteen years ago that requires manufacturers of medical devices to provide proof of rigorous testing and safety analysis to the FDA for all Tier 3 medical devices (classified as those devices that are implanted or that a person relies on for life) prior to approval.

Second, a group of FDA scientists went public with their allegations of corruption, mismanagement and coercion within the FDA. The scientists stated that the scientific review process for medical devices “has been corrupted and distorted by current FDA managers, thereby placing the American people at risk.” They allege that managers at the FDA lacked scientific knowledge and clinical expertise regarding medical devices and that they have ignored the experts and scientists within the FDA. The authors stated that they had been ordered to modify their findings and evaluations of medical devices—allowing for the approval of products that may not be safe.

And third, the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a report uncovering a troublesome conflict of interest inherent in the FDA approval system. The FDA failed to collect information on financial ties between those that perform clinical tests and the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture the product being tested in an alarming 42% of the cases. HHS claims that such financial ties may compromise the safety of the people in the clinical trials and the authenticity and integrity of the final research data.

“The scientists working at the FDA think that Americans are in danger. Other governmental entities report that the FDA is inept at keeping the American public safe. Yet Governor Perdue inexplicably thinks we should trust a corrupt federal bureaucracy to keep Georgians safe,” said Andy Childers, an Atlanta attorney.

National leaders in medicine don’t think that FDA approval is enough to keep people safe either. In a friend-of-the-court brief filed in association with the case of Wyeth v Levine, multiple editors of the New England Journal of Medicine stated, “The FDA alone simply lacks the ability to serve as the sole guarantor of drug safety." The doctors went on to say that without civil lawsuits and the discovery they produce, "the FDA would be stripped of an essential source of information that the agency has consistently relied on when making its regulatory decisions, and the American public would be deprived of a vital deterrent against pharmaceutical company misconduct."

“SB 101 gives negligent companies, who hurt or harm citizens of this state a ‘Get out of Jail Free’ card for the real world,” said Childers. “It’s clear to me where the Governor’s priorities are. He’d rather grant favors to big corporations than ensure the Constitutional Rights of the people of Georgia. Let’s hope the Legislature doesn’t agree.”

February 4, 2009

Don't Hold Your Breath for Governor Perdue to Fix Peanut Catastrophe

In the midst of what can only be described as one of the worst catastrophes to befall Georgia, the Peanut Corporation of America Salmonella Scandal, Governor Perdue today "promises" to do something about it. While wearing a tie with peanuts on it, (was that some apparent attempt at humor?) Governor Perdue promised he would do something but didn't say what or when or how or by whom. No solutions.

And yet in the middle of this catastrophe, Governor Perdue has the time and energy and audacity to offer new legislation today that would eliminate the ability of a Georgia citizen to seek civil damages from any Georgia pharmaceutical company whose drug harmed a Georgia citizen if the FDA had approved the drug. The is the SAME FDA that coudn't protect us from peanuts! Is he kidding? Or does he really mean to treat Georgia citizens like this? One of the ironic things about this bill is that ONLY Georgians are harmed by it! If a citizen of, say, Alabama, takes a drug from Georgia and is harmed by it, that Alabama citizen can sue the Georgia manufacturer in Alabama, but a Georgia citizen would have no ability to hold the Georgia pharmaceutical company liable for the harm it has caused to a Georgia citizen.

This is truly unbelievable and really shocking that the Governor or the Legislature would for even a minute take the bill seriously. I think it is more evidence of the arrogance of the Governor and his disdain for the Georgia Civil Justice System, which, as opposed to the FDA, is truly a legitimate method of holding negligent companies accountable. And by the way, since when did it become unacceptable to hold negligent corporations accountable for the damage they cause? Sometimes I feel like the Governor is in Wonderland.

February 3, 2009

Governor Perdue's Proposed Immunity for Pharaceutical Companies an Insult to All Georgia Citizens

I continue to be dismayed at Governor Perdue's apparent disdain for his constituents, the hard-working Everyday Georgians. His proposal to eliminate the right and ability of Georgia citizens to hold Georgia pharmaceutical companies responsible for injuries they cause here in Georgia is INSULTING and a slap in the face of every Georgian. Not to mention the fact that it is probably unconstitutional, as it would limit only the rights of Georgians to seek justice, not of other Americans' ability to sue Georgia pharmaceutical companies. Imagine that! Governor Perdue is ready, willing and able to throw away your rights because you live in Georgia, but he can't take away the rights of someone living, say, in Alabama who has been injured by a Georgia pharmaceutical company. What a joke! But, unfortunately, Governor Perdue, in his continued shortsightedness and misunderstanding of the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Georgia, will be attempting to get the Georgia General Assembly to pass such an insane law.

My good friend and fellow trial lawyer, Jay Cook, wrote an op-ed column in the Atlanta Journal and Constitution today. It is reprinted below. Jay, like me, is a Past Preident of the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association. Jay is also a former President of the State Bar of Georgia and now continues the fight to protect the inalienable rights of all Georgians. Good job, Friend! And Fellow Georgians, please contact Governor Perdue's office and let him know you are not going to take it any more. Also, please contact your State Senator and State Representative and ask them to vote against the Governor's proposed limitation of your rights.

Should Georgia limit liability for drug companies? CON
Our safety needs to be defended
By JAY COOK

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

A little over four years ago, a veteran Federal Drug Administration scientist rocked the pharmaceutical industry with Senate testimony that exposed a legalized conflict of interest that was endangering the health and safety of the American public: the FDA’s funding depends largely on the success of products of the industry it regulates. “The FDA is incapable of protecting America from unsafe drugs or from another Vioxx,” Dr. David Graham warned.

Gov. Sonny Perdue has introduced a bill promising freedom from liability to Georgia-based pharmaceutical companies that sell FDA-approved drugs and devices. The bill would make it nearly impossible for Georgians to sue for injuries caused by these products. He claims it will lure more businesses to Georgia and “protect Georgia companies from personal injury lawyers.” But who will protect consumers from pharmaceutical companies that care more about profits than people? Obviously not the FDA.

Gov. Perdue calls his bill “tort reform.” But it’s got “rulebook rigging” written all over it. Rulebook rigging is my term for industries or special interest groups that try to game the system so they can legalize putting profits ahead of public safety.

Unfortunately, rulebook rigging isn’t limited to the FDA. The Consumer Products Safety Commission, OSHA and the Environmental Protection Agency, among other public safety watchdogs, also have been cut to the bone or reconfigured to cater to the industries they’re supposed to be policing.

If we need evidence (beyond Vioxx, Rezulin, fen-phen and Bextra) of the disastrous consequences of allowing industries to neuter their own government watchdogs, we need only look to Wall Street.

But even without such preferential oversight, consumers have only one place to turn when something goes wrong: our civil justice system.

But that protection, too, is being undermined thanks to tort “reform” — another rulebook rigging scam. To date, the powerful special interests pushing these “reforms” have spent more than $1 billion to brainwash us (and get a tax deduction) with contrived horror stories about how lawsuits are driving up insurance rates and putting good doctors out of business. The truth is that lawsuits, which have no impact on insurance rates, don’t put good doctors out of business — but, thanks to “reform” — lawsuits can’t hold bad ones accountable, either. Meanwhile, health care costs and insurance rates are still skyrocketing.

Our elected state representatives, who capped damages on medical malpractice lawsuits four years ago, seem to have forgotten that the civil justice system is there to enforce the rulebook of fair play, to keep America and Americans safe and to deter and punish wrongful behavior that injures others. Or have they?

The founding fathers must be rolling in their graves. They handed down government regulations and impartial civil juries for a reason: to promote public trust and safety and to keep our rights from being trampled by tyrants with too much power and money and too little humanity. They understood that America needed more than the free market economy to enforce the practice of fair play because they knew that not everyone plays fair. As James Madison, father of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, wrote: “If men were angels we would need no government.”

It may not be too late to preserve our legacy. But first we must stop listening to the fear-mongering flim-flam of rulebook riggers and start seeing the game for what it really is: a con to pocket higher profits at the expense of our safety and our sacred right to liberty and justice for all. Shouldn’t the American Dream be about more than money?


• Jay Cook is president of the board of directors of the Georgia Civil Justice Foundation and a past president of the State Bar of Georgia.