March 28, 2011

Ten Year Struggle for Justice Against WalMart

courthousedome.jpg


The United States Supreme Court will be hearing oral arguments tomorrow in a gender discrimination class action case against WalMart. The plaintiffs, female employees of WalMart, allege WalMart has been
paying women in the United States less than men for the same work and of passing the women over for promotions while only promoting men. The women plaintiffs' march to justice has taken a mere ten years. This should show you how much courage and tenacity it takes to be a plaintiff in high stakes litigation against a large corporation. To say these women are the underdogs wins the Understatement of the Year Award. One of the original plaintiffs who first brought the lawsuit against the mega-retailer in 2001 confirmed this by explaining "I'm a fighter if nothing else, and so are all the other women that are involved," said Christine Kwapnoski.

No doubt that these women plaintiffs are fighters. You have to be to take on one of the world's largest corporations, who can afford the most expensive legal talent in the United States. And, to bring a claim of gender discrimination which, unfortunately, has become one of the hardest types of cases to win as a plaintiff. The case law that has developed by interpreting the application of Title VII, The Equal Rights Act, tends to favor the employer in nearly all circuits. The Eleventh Circuirt Court of Appeals, of which Atlanta is a part, has some of the most conservative opinions in the country interpreting Title VII such that only a very small percentage of these cases ever sees the light of day with a jury. The vast majority of them are thrown out of court by the trial court judge on what is called a Motion for Summary Judgment. The odds are clearly against the plaintiffs.


If the court rules in favor of the women and grants them "class certification," it will most likely become the largest employment class-action suit in history, involving potentially millions of women and billions of dollars. Keep in mind the U.S. Supreme Court will not be making a decision on the merits of the case, i.e., whether Wal-Mart did, in fact, discriminate against women. Rather, the Court will be deciding whether the class certification, of a class that would potentially include millions of women, should go forward.

That this opinion from the Supreme Court could be an eye-opener for corporate America is without question. Many Americans will be eagerly awaiting the Court's decision, which is expected this summer. I know I will be and I will keep you posted right here.

Bookmark and Share

March 8, 2011

City of Atlanta to Pay Residents $1.5 Million for Longstanding Sewer Damgage

Residents Awarded $1.5M For Sewer Damage
Posted: 6:45 am EST March 8, 2011
Updated: 6:46 am EST March 8, 2011

ATLANTA -- The city of Atlanta has settled a long-standing lawsuit with 23 Atlanta residents who have dealt with years of flooding and raw sewage backups in their homes.

The Atlanta City Council voted 14-0 on Monday to let the residents share a $1.5 million payout. The city acknowledged there was significant property damage caused by what it called "the failure and inadequacies of the city of Atlanta's storm water and sanitary sewer systems."

Most of the residents lived in a part of the city that has flooded for years because of inadequate storm water damage and the city's outdated sewer system.

Sam L. Starks, who represented the 23 residents, said water was "literally washing away portions of their homes."
Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Bookmark and Share

March 4, 2011

Georgia Federal Jury awards $700,000.00 to former MARTA Employee

Jury awards MARTA lieutenant $700,000 verdict
ShareThisPrint E-mail By Bill Rankin


The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

A federal jury has awarded $700,000 to a police lieutenant on charges MARTA retaliated against him after he filed a race discrimination complaint against the agency.


On Wednesday, the jury awarded Lt. George Hernandez $100,000 in lost wages and benefits, $450,000 for emotional pain and anguish and $150,000 in punitive damages, his lawyer, Debra Schwartz, said. Schwartz said that after Hernandez filed a discrimination complaint in March 2007, MARTA withdrew an acting precinct commander position it had offered him, declined to interview him for future promotions and wrote him up for poor performance.

MARTA spokesman Lyle Harris said the agency's "legal team is closely reviewing the trial record and considering our options, going forward."

Hernandez is a long-time veteran of the MARTA police force. He took vacation for the recent trial and will return to work next week, Schwartz said.

The federal jury declined to find that MARTA discriminated against Hernandez on racial grounds when the lieutenant was passed over for promotions in 2006.

"We would have liked to win on the race discrimination claims," Schwartz said. "But we thought the jury was very careful in listening to the evidence and awarding damages that he deserved for the retaliation. Overall, we're thrilled with the verdict."

Bookmark and Share